Misunderstandings Communication Essay

Who was the sender?Both Co-OwnersWho was the telephone receiver?EmployeesWhat was the contentedness?No aides for the upcoming divisionWhat channel was apply to send the kernel?A memorandumrandumWhat was the misunderstanding that occurred?The memo discussed the profit gross revenue from memo What we turn over and what the company derriere do, based on generated profit, are two different things. In fiscal year 2010, we experienced disconsolate debt of $2,681.39 on sales of $1,900,030.89. At this smear, we select bad debt of $9,050.45 on projected sales of $2,200,000.00. The misunderstanding is because in that respect are that eight employees and the company did non live on a great loss that would draw a blank bonuses. Considering that the projected sales ($2.2 million) at the point of the memo was through 10/15/2011. How could the misunderstanding drop been avoided?By not sharing with ALL eight (8) employees the apostrophize of sales and not think there were no fin ance minded slew in the group.1. What did you learn about the confabulation forge from this activity? That communication must(prenominal) be clear and it should continuously have a argument and a conclusion. 2. What seemed to be the master(prenominal) causes of the misunderstandings? The struggle to cover up the real reason for not granting the bonus to the employees. And, the argument in which the owner give tongue to was not a fairnessful conclusion. 3. What tips jackpot you propose for preventing misunderstandings in communication? To always collect sure that the claim is something that the truth can be found.Who was the sender?chief financial officer/Male co-ownerWho was the receiver?Employees/Female Co-ownerWhat was the message?No CODs to be delivered without recompense unless approved by chief financial officer What channel was used to send the message?A memoWhat was the misunderstanding that occurred?That everyone, front office and manner of speaking driver, und erstood the rule but the womanish co-owner would go behind everyone and deliver harvesting anyway not getting the payment leaving the employees to suffer the wrath of the CFO regarding the unpaid pitching. How could the misunderstanding have been avoided?If the female co-owner would have paid upfront the delivery that she was making for the customer or good abides by the same rules as everyone else for the well-being of the company.1. What did you learn about the communication process from this activity? That communication must be clear and it should always have a argument and a conclusion. 2. What seemed to be the main causes of the misunderstandings? The struggle of power between the co-owners that caused employees the unfitness to do a job. 3. What tips can you suggest for preventing misunderstandings in communication? To always make sure that the claim is something that the truth can be found.